Whorearchy

Ich finde OnlyFans mittlerweile richtig gut

Abgesehen davon dass viele Freaks und Dysfunktionale dort abgestellt werden ist der Erfolg von OnlyFans das finale Fuck you an die bornierte Arbeitsmoral von was lernen und was orboiden.

Das Konzept von dieser Grasroots Internet Pornografie nimmt immer mehr den Mittelmann heraus genau so wie das Mobiltelefon immer weiter den Pimp selbst aus dem Prostitutionsgeschäft gedrängt hat. Und im Falle von diesen gescheiterten C-Promis, den Kandidaten für Trash TV Sendungen, nimmt es den überflüssigsten Mittelsmann überhaupt heraus. Ich fand es immer verheuchelt und borniert und habe es in der Vergangenheit oft kritisiert wenn irgendwelchen Schönheitswettbewerb Kandidatinnen und Gewinnerinnen im Nachhinein ihr Titel entzogen wurde weil sie Pornografie gemacht haben, als ob irgendein Loch so einen dummen Titel mit Plastikkrone gewinnt weil sie so ein intellektuelles Leuchtfeuer ist. Diese Clownshow kann komplett übersprungen werden.

Ich denke diese Entwicklung ist eine große Befreiung. Einerseits für die Weiber selbst, die so von der egalitären und bourguisen Moral befreit werden sie wären dem Mann gleich und könnten alles tun was Männer können und sollten deswegen in dummen Jobs versauern genau wie diese. Auf der anderen Seite ist es eine Befreiung für den Mann der längst dazu gelernt hat und nun frei ist von der Kultur des Vortäuschens als ob es bei irgendwas das Weiber involviert um was anderes gehen würde als um deren Pussy.

DM: Big bucks! The former carpenter, 28, recently shared his earnings from the site on Instagram, 

revealing he had made more than $50,000 in just one month

Ich sehe hier überhaupt keinen Unterschied zu den anderen Einkommensklassen der Sportler und Popstars.

Unser Problem als Kultur ist nicht dass jetzt alle zu Huren werden sondern dass uns die Reste einer bequemlichen, bourguisen und biederen Pseudo-Moral darin sabotieren wollen dieses Phänomen zu realisieren und seine Normalität zu akzeptieren während sie selbst gleichzeitig nirgendwo hin führt. Du wirst es nicht verhindern dass Weiber ihre Löcher für Geld anbieten. 

She claims that selling nudes on social media was extremely lucrative. "I was making like, £15,000 to £20,000 a month," she says. "I wanted to be quite big and successful and make money, it was a big thing for me."
Hannah says she hasn't attended school for the past couple of years. "I used to get a lot of hate at school and I was bullied. I got pushed out of school when I was about 13, 14. I was like, I'm not going to school, it's not happening."
Turning to the internet after refusing to continue her education, she says: "I was 14, turning 15, when I started gaining followers [online]. A lot of them were around my age because they knew me in person."
OnlyFans users often use other social networks, like Twitter and Snapchat, to advertise their OnlyFans profiles and direct followers to them. Research conducted by the BBC found that, on a single day, a third of all the Twitter profiles analysed for the study could have belonged to an underage person. 

Ich identifiziere das Problem hier bei der Schule und nicht bei einem Verhalten, Nudies verkaufen, welches ich eher als normal attestiere, auch wenn sie das selbst nicht erkennen kann wenn sie sagt "My biggest fear is going back into an office and being normal again.", denn nichts an dem Office Workspace ist normal.

#Nudes4Sale Uncovers The Shocking Truth About Selling Nudes Online

Flynn meets Hannah*, a 17-year-old girl from Scotland who has been selling explicit content of herself since she was 16. Hannah initially set up an account on OnlyFans using a fake ID. Her account was then reported for being underage and was kicked off the site, but she managed to set up a new profile and continues selling nudes.
More young women are interviewed, like 20-year-old Sasha*, who earns a few hundred pounds each month on OnlyFans and uses that money to put a roof over her head. At age 15, Sasha sent explicit photos to boys on Snapchat, but things spiralled when one of her photos was leaked. "Unfortunately, my parents kicked me out and they are not ready to deal with how I lead my life."

- Refinery29 

Ja echt shocking Truth hier Leute; Weiber sind Huren.

Dazu ein historischer Vergleich.:

With good reason, the keepers of American morality in the nineteenth century were terribly worried about all the single men in the West. One Protestant minister wrote, “Left by themselves, men degenerate rapidly and become rough, harsh, slovenly—almost brutish.” He was correct. Ironically, most of these men were white and full American citizens. But they cared little for the restrictions and responsibilities of citizenship. One moral reformer in Montana reported this about life in a mining town: “Men without the restraint of law, indifferent to public opinion, and unburdened by families, drink whenever they feel like it, whenever they have the money to pay for it, and whenever there is nothing else to do… . Bad manners follow, profanity becomes a matter of course… . Excitability and nervousness brought on by rum help these tendencies along, and then to correct this state of things the pistol comes into play.” In the silver mining boomtown of Leadville, Colorado, in 1879 there were 120 saloons, 19 beer halls, 188 gambling houses, and only 4 churches.

Into this world stepped legions of women who understood something about supply and demand. A U.S. Department of Labor study in 1916 found that in the major legitimate occupations for women—department store clerking and light manufacturing—the average weekly wage was $6.67, which at the time represented a subsistence standard of living. In such industries, jobs were few, and due to the ban on women’s labor in most of the economy, the number of available workers in the industries that allowed women was great. This oversupply of labor pushed wages down to the minimum. By contrast, women who chose prostitution enjoyed a highly favorable market for their labor. Demand was enormous and constant, especially in the West, and the pool of available labor was kept relatively small by the great number of women who internalized or feared the stigma attached to prostitution.

According to historian Ruth Rosen, who pioneered the social history of prostitution in the United States, “The average brothel inmate or streetwalker”—the lowest positions in the trade—“received from one to five dollars a ‘trick,’ earning in one evening what other working women made in a week.” Prostitutes in a 1916 study reported earnings between $30 to $50 per week, at a time when skilled male trade union members averaged roughly $20 per week. In their study of Virginia City, Nevada, George M. Blackburn and Sherman L. Ricards found that prostitutes in that 1860s boomtown, unlike the stereotype of the innocent, young “white slave,” were actually considerably older on average than women of the western mining states Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. “From the age data on prostitutes, it is clear that they were old enough to realize the nature of their behavior and also old enough to have married had they so desired, for this was an area with many unattached men. Thus we conclude that these were professional women intent on economic success.” After working as a domestic in El Paso, Texas, for $3 per week, a Mexican-born woman quit her job and “decided to become a puta” for the extra money. She later recalled, “It took me a long time to get used to having men intimately explore my body… . Of course, I had guilt feelings at the beginning, but they soon disappeared when I saw my savings begin mounting up.”

Even in the tighter markets of the East, prostitutes were extraordinarily well paid. In New York City, according to historian Timothy Gilfoyle, “an affluent, but migratory, class of prostitutes flourished.” Low wages “in the factory and the household made prostitutes the best-paid women workers in the nineteenth-century city.” In studies conducted in New York during the 1900s and 1910s, 11 percent of prostitutes listed coercion as the reason for entering the trade, but almost 28 percent named the money they could earn. Members of the Vice Commission of Chicago, like many anti-prostitution reformers, faced the hard truth of the wealth being accrued by prostitutes with a bitter question: “Is it any wonder that a tempted girl who receives only six dollars per week working with her hands sells her body for twenty-five dollars per week when she learns there is a demand for it and men are willing to pay the price?” One Chicago prostitute who supported her family with her wages had an answer. She told an interviewer, “Do you suppose I am going back to earn five or six dollars a week in a factory, and at that, never have a cent of it to spend for myself, when I can earn that amount any night, and often much more?” Historian Ruth Rosen was “struck again and again by most prostitutes’ view of their work as ‘easier’ and less oppressive than other survival strategies they might have chosen.”
Prostitutes were the first women to break free of what early American feminists described as a system of female servitude. Charlotte Perkins Gilman, one of the leading feminist intellectuals at the turn of the twentieth century, noted that human beings were the only species in which “an entire sex lives in a relation of economic dependence upon the other sex.” Since wages in respectable occupations were so low, the only culturally sanctioned means for a woman to attain wealth was through a rich husband. And since states in the nineteenth century granted few or no property rights to married women, even women who “married well” owned little or nothing of their own. But women who chose to be bad could live well on their own.
Prostitutes who rose to the top of the industry to become “madams” owned more wealth than any other women in the United States. Indeed, they were among the wealthiest people in the country, and especially in the West. “Diamond Jessie” Hayman began work as a prostitute in the gold country of the Sierra Nevada foothills in the 1880s, then moved to San Francisco to become one of the most successful prostitutes in the city’s history. Hayman’s three-story brothel in the Tenderloin district of San Francisco included three fireplaces, a saloon, a champagne cellar, and fifteen suites filled with imported furniture. She provided each of her employees with a $6,000 wardrobe that included a fox fur coat, four tailored suits, eight hats, two dress coats, twelve pairs of shoes, twelve pairs of gloves, seven evening gowns, and seven negligees. Hayman earned enough money from her business to buy several parcels of land in the city. After the 1906 earthquake that destroyed much of San Francisco, Hayman and other madams provided food and clothing to the thousands left homeless. She died in 1923 with an estate worth $116,000.

...

In an 1859 poll of 2,000 New York City women who sold sex, Dr. William Sanger asked, “What was the cause of your becoming a prostitute?” About 1,100 gave him answers he expected to hear, such as “destitution,” “seduced and abandoned,” “ill-treatment of parents, relatives, or husbands,” and “bad company.” But to Sanger’s great surprise, 513 prostitutes—more than one-quarter of those he interviewed—said they chose their profession out of “inclination.” The doctor called this response “incredible.” A large number of the women did not even see their profession as work: 181 stated as their main reason for choosing it “drink, and the desire to drink,” while 124 saw prostitution “as an easy life.” Twenty-nine women—who might be the baddest renegades in American history—said they became prostitutes because they were “too idle to work.” Says Gilfoyle, “these women did not view prostitution as deviance or sin; rather, they considered it a better alternative to the factory or domestic servitude.” Prior to the legal crackdown on prostitution in New York after the Civil War, prostitutes in the city “did not see themselves as ‘fallen women.’” In court and in the press, “They publicly defended their personal integrity and private property instead of succumbing to violent intimidation, and they refused to act as fugitives from justice.”

- A Renegade History of the United States

(Der Autor ist ein Yid, ich hab schon nachgeschaut)

Der Punkt ist dass wir wieder einmal in einer Situation sind die in der Vergangenheit so oft aufgetreten ist dass man sie als Normal bezeichnen kann. Wir haben Männer und Weiber die gleichermaßen keinen Bock auf die Gesellschaft und dafür verschiedenen Methoden des Escapismus haben. Und in jeder Gesellschaft zu jeder Zeit; Männer und Frauen verdienen sich gegenseitig.

Wenn du einen Schuldigen suchen willst such ihn bei den Generationen an Versagern deren Kinder diese Content Creator und Konsumenten sind. Ein Vater der seinem Jungen nichts über Wesen und Wirken der Weiber beigebracht hat ist auch nicht zu erwarten ein Mann der großes Vertrauen von seinen Töchtern inspiriert. Gleiches gilt für Mütter die ihren Kindern nichts beibringen können.
Gute Zeiten; schwache Männer und so. Der Rest ergibt sich von selbst.